List

Stencil art in Madison, Wisconsin. Image taken on August 7, 2007 by David Drexler.

 

As Israelis and Palestinians drift toward direct peace talks under the orchestration of US Secretary of State John Kerry, leaders from both sides have called for national plebiscites to approve any final status agreement. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is attempting to rush forward with a referendum bill ahead of talks with the Palestinians. Habayit Hayehudi Chairman Naftali Bennett insisted that a referendum be included in the coalition agreement at the end of the 2013 Israeli elections and, more recently, has threatened to hold up passage of the state budget if a referendum was not guaranteed. On the Palestinian side, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has indicated that he may put approval of a peace treaty to Palestinian voters. Despite their profound differences, Israeli and Palestinian leaders are seemingly finding common ground in their pursuit of the “referendum gambit” to avoid making decisions that might undermine their hold on political power.

In the past, both Israeli and Palestinian leaders have contemplated national referendums to settle fundamental questions within their respective communities. While Palestinian President Yasser Arafat never publically considered the possibility of a national plebiscite, Abbas has occasionally hinted at referendums to decide internal Palestinian political struggles. Israeli leaders, on the other hand, have a long history of supporting the idea that the consent of its citizens is necessary to approve peace agreements.

 

Referendums in Palestinian Politics

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has indicated support for national referendums twice throughout his term.

  • 2006   In the aftermath of the 2006 Palestinian elections, Abbas called for a referendum on the so-called Prisoners’ Document, which advocated reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah and outlined principles for a future peace with Israel.

Until this week’s call for a referendum, Abbas had only threatened a national plebiscite to deal with internal Palestinian politics; namely a struggle for power with Hamas in which Abbas believed his odds for success were improved. The call for a referendum on a peace treaty with Israel is troubling in that it may suggest that Abbas does not believe he has the strength to make the agreement stick or to thwart any potential Hamas-led rejectionism. Ultimately, despite occasional threats to resign, Abbas intends to remain President of the Palestine; if he senses that a peace agreement may jeopardize his chances to preserve his position, then it makes sense to seek political cover through a referendum.

Referendums in Israeli Politics

While the idea of a national referendum on a peace agreement is a relatively new idea in Palestine, in Israel there is a long history to the idea that a public referendum would be necessary to approve any future peace agreement that necessitated territorial concessions.  Despite an existing legal framework to facilitate such a vote, Israel’s political leaders regularly contemplated a national referendum on peace deals throughout the 1990s.

  • 1994   Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin proposed a national plebiscite as Israel entered into negotiations with Syria and the prospects of returning the Golan Heights became increasingly real.
  • 1996   Prime Minister Shimon Peres, during a close and contentious campaign against Binyamin Netanyahu, called for a referendum on any peace agreement with the Palestinians in attempt to win over swing voters.
  • 1998   Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu considered a national referendum in order to proceed with Israeli withdraws from the Occupied Palestinian Territories, as outlined in the Olso Accords.

During the 2005 Gaza Disengagement, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon broke with this tradition by explicitly refusing to submit his withdraw plan to a public vote. With calls from senior members of his Likud party demanding a referendum, Sharon chose instead to dissolve the Knesset and hold elections. Sharon’s incapacitation due to a series of strokes during the election campaign led to

In the fall of 2010, Israeli MK Ofir Akunis (Likud) proposed a bill requiring a national referendum on any future peace agreement with the Palestinians that required an Israeli withdraw from territories in the West Bank. While this particular bill failed to become law, a second bill that required both a majority vote of the Knesset as well as a public referendum on Israeli withdraw from the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem did win Knesset approval on November 23, 2010 on a 65-33 vote in the body.  Despite the failure of Israel rightists to create a comprehensive system of Israeli public approval future peace deals, the 2010 referendum set the stage for future attempts.

In the aftermath of the 2013 Israeli elections, the idea of a referendum on peace with Palestinians became entangled in coalition negotiations, with Habayit Hayehudi insisting that a provision for such be included in their coalition agreement with Likud – Yisrael Beiteinu. In late April 2013, MK Yariv Levin (Likud) submitted a revised version of the Akunis bill for consideration by the Knesset. Like the 2010 bill, this attempt to impose a national referendum on the Israeli-Palestinian peace process was thwarted in the Knesset. Specifically, the indication that Yesh Atid chairman Yair Lapid would not support a referendum effectively halted any further consideration of the bill.  However, three short months later, as negotiations with Palestinians became a realistic possibility, Lapid changed his position and embraced possibility of a national referendum. Despite growing public support for a referendum in Israel, several leaders, including Tzipi Livni, Shelley Yachimovich, Avigdor Lieberman and Zehava Gal-On, have criticized the calls for a plebiscite as a shirking of the duties and responsibilities by elected leaders.

 

The Referendum Gambit

In Israel as in Palestine, referendums are often threatened but never acted upon. To date, neither Palestinians nor Israelis have voted in such a referendum and, because of this, the referendum must be viewed as a sort political cudgel used to gain advantage in moments of potential crisis. If history is any indicator of what will happen with the most recent calls for plebiscites in Israel and Palestine, then we can all rest assured that such a vote will never take place and we that are witnessing little more than political posturing and the melodramatic theatrics of politicians who believe their power may be jeopardized as the region staggers toward peace talks that may fundamentally shatter the status quo. Yet by the same token, if past behavior is believed to dictate future performance, then there is little reason to be optimistic that these latest Israeli-Palestinian peace talks will bear significant results.

By on .

Leave a Reply

  Posts

October 18th, 2015

Mapping the Dead in the Latest Israeli-Palestinian Violence

Basma Atassi at Al-Jazeera has put together a great storymap that explores the latest violence between Israelis and Palestinians. Complete with pictures, text and place location, this resource allows you to get a good sense of where, when and how the violence is occurring. Definitely worth a look.

October 16th, 2015

Netanyahu, Context & Responsibility

At the center of this current iteration of violence in Israel and Palestine stands the Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu has reacted to this violence as if he was surprised that Palestinians would resort to violence when for decades he has done everything within his power to thwart the establishment and growth of a responsible Palestinian civil society, expanded settlements with the explicit aim of crippling an emerging Palestinian state, and undermining the responsible leadership of Mahmoud Abbas at every possible opportunity.

October 8th, 2015

Abbas, Netanyahu and Responsible Leadership

Abbas is demonstrating his commitment to deescalating tensions and calming the violence that is a direct result of Netanyahu’s persistent efforts to whip Israeli society into a panicked frenzy about an existential threat lurking behind every corner.

June 30th, 2015

Our Dictator in Cairo – Abdel Fatah el-Sisi

So, once again, the foreign policy of the US has chosen perceived immediate stability over the somewhat more bumpy and unpredictable evolution of democracy in the Middle East. It’s not the first time we’ve done this… it’s sort of our thing at this point… we’re pro’s out it.

June 22nd, 2015

The Many Victims at Mother Emmanuel

The problem with Gosnell and others who make these arguments is that they believe intentionality serves as some magical “Get out of Jail Free” card that absolves perpetrators of the violence they commit. Further, and in many ways far more problematic, is the realization that Gosnell and others only want to use this logical canard to absolve themselves or other like them. No such compassion regarding intentionality and the multiplicity of victims derived from violence will ever be used with the families of the 9-11 hijackers. In the end, the fundamental mistake that Gosnell and others make over and over again is that they focus on issues of intentionality rather than on issues of responsibility.

March 4th, 2015

Mr. Netanyahu Goes to Congress

There are two things to never forget when considering Netanyahu’s views of regional threats. First, he is desperately seeking his “Churchill moment”. Second, he has a record of being blinded by his own biases and is never, ever a sober analyst of a situation

February 16th, 2015

Cursed Be The Peacemakers?

This video, produced by Israeli settlers in the West Bank, has been released as part of the current Israeli political contest where the extreme right wing of Israel is attempting to maintain the rightist complexion of the Israeli government. For me, the truly offensive aspect of this video is how it makes the case that working for peace between Israelis and Palestinians or defending Palestinian and Israeli human rights somehow makes you a threat to the country.

February 14th, 2015

The Danger of Molly White’s Islamophobia

Rep. White is the new poster child for the anti-Muslim bigotry, Islamic hatred and Islamophobia that is so deeply embedded in American society that it can hide in plain sight.

July 15th, 2014

In Focus: The Gaza Strip

As Israeli bombs are dropped throughout the Gaza Strip and Hamas missiles are launched into Israel, the media coverage has focused on discussing Gaza as a known yet ill-defined entity. We are made aware of roughly where it is (next to Israel), who lives there (Hamas) and what happens there (rockets are made and launched). But this reductionist view of Gaza doesn’t provide any insights into the common, everyday lived experience of the 1.8 million Palestinians who live in the 360 sq. km that makes up the Gaza Strip.

July 14th, 2014

Middle East News Review #28

The Middle East was plagued with news of violence this week. In Israel, Palestine, Iraq and Libya, episodes of violence resulted in death and destruction. Iran continued its negotiations with the US and EU this week in the hopes of reaching an agreement over the country’s nuclear program and removing the economic sanctions that have crippled its economy. In Iraq, violence between the militant group ISIS and the Baghdad government reached new heights as 29 people were found massacred in an apartment and Human Rights Watch condemned the government for mass executions carried out earlier this year. The direct physical violence in Iraq was mirrored this week with political turmoil as the government of Nouri al-Maliki erupted into conflict with the semi-autonomous Kurdish government.